During 1957 I served in USS CAIMAN (SS 323) with Lieutenant Commander Jack Hawkins as CO. Jack was a wonderful man to work for if you didn’t mind being held to very high professional standards. We had a very good boat, and as I recall we won the E that year. However, Jack became concerned about the fire control party’s lack of precision at the firing point. So we retired to the conning tower one afternoon during the final week of upkeep before a week of type training and we practiced and practiced and practiced. We responded to a dummy target introduced from sonar, solved for target motion and honed our skills at the firing point procedures. “Set, Shoot, Fire!” rang out time after time as we simulated firing torpedoes. This seemed to go on for hours. Jack never yelled at us but he was adept at Chinese water torture methods and he never let up for a minute. ‘Set, Shoot, Fire!” again and again, ad nauseam. Finally we quit, having honed ourselves to a very fine edge, with Jack confident that he had the best firing point fire control team in the Pacific Submarine Force.
On Monday we went to sea and started an approach on the target. I was fire control coordinator and Ray Heimbach, our XO, was assistant approach officer. John Shilling manned the TDC and Joe Smith was ATDC officer. We did a nice job of target motion analysis as I recall and were getting close to the point where we could fire a Mk 14-5 steam torpedo with a high hit probability. Ray checked on all the details: torpedo ready, tube flooded, and muzzle door open, as the range closed.
Then he made a fatal mistake. He turned to John Shilling at the TDC and asked John “Are you set?” Immediately Joe Smith, having heard the magic word “Set” and having already computed the spread, yelled “Shoot”, the fire control man on the firing key hit the button and yelled “Fire” and away went the exercise torpedo with poor Ray yelling “Noooooo” and trying to pull it back into tube with body English.
I can still remember Jack Hawkins’ look of disgust at his highly trained and finely tuned fire control party as the torpedo went out and missed the target.
THE SUBMARINE REVIEW
THE SUBMARINE REVIEW is a quarterly publication of the Naval Submarine League. It is a forum for discussion of submarine matters. Not only are the ideas of its members to be reflected in the REVIEW, but those of others as well, who are interested in submarines and submarining.
Articles for this publication will be accepted on any subject closely related to submarine matters. Their length should be a maximum of about 2500 words. The League prepares REVIEW copy for publication using Word Perfect. If possible to do so, accompaning a submission with a 3.5″ diskette is of significant assistance in that process. The content of articles is of first importance in their selection for the REVIEW. Editing of articles for clarity may be necessary, since important ideas should be readily understood by the readers of the REVIEW.
A stipend of up to $200.00 will be paid for each major article published. Annually, three articles are selected for special recognition and an honorarium of up to $400.00 will be awarded to the authors. Articles accepted for publication in the REVIEW become the property of the Naval Submarine League. The views expressed by the authors are their own and are not to be construed to be those of the Naval Submarine League. In those instances where the NSL has taken and published an official position or view, specific reference to that fact will accompany the article.
Comments on articles and brief discussion items are welcomed to make THE SUBMARINE REVIEW a dynamic reflection of the League’s interest in submarines. The success of this magazine is up to those persons who have such a dedicated interest in submarines that they want to keep alive the submarine past, help with present submarine problems and be influential in guiding the future of submarines in the U.S. Navy.
Articles should be submitted to the Editor, SUBMARINE REVIEW, P.O. Box 1146, Annandale, VA 22003 .
