Contact Us   |    Join   |    Donate
THIS WEBSITE IS SPONSORED BY PROGENY, A CORPORATE MEMBER OF THE NSL

Re: A JUNIOR OFFICER’S VIEW-Con

I read Lt. Hong’s ‘Discussion” article regarding possible ways to improve/change the Submarine Force (THE SUBMARINE REVIEW, October 20 I 0). There is one section of the article I find a bit hard to believe, specifically that some higher authority would require the XO and CO to review tire training exam. While it has been almost 30 years since I was CO of an SSN, as I recall most of my priorities were those I set for myself:

I. Tactics and Warfighting
2. Training and looking out for the officers and crew
3. Not running aground
4. Not having a collision
5. Passing major exams (ORSE, ORE, NTPI)
6. During major maintenance periods:
a) Not letting seawater in the ship
b) Not letting primary coolant out of the pipes
c) Not pulling more than one rod during Control Rod Testing

I had tours as both an Engineer (USS SCAMP) and Navigator (USS POGY) and felt well prepared as XO and CO for those tours.

In summary, I think it is more the individuals than the system and would recommend we continue as we are.

Captain Mike Raggett, USN (Ret)
Former CO USS POLLACK (SSN603)
COMSUBRON THREE

Naval Submarine League

© 2022 Naval Submarine League